Analysis of November Texas Constitutional Amendments via Blue Dot Blues

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11


Editorials

Citizens Have Opportunity to Claim Property (St. Rep. Ken Paxton)

"Political Fiction That Stimulus Dollars Were Necessary To Balance Our Budget" (Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst)

When will Big Government advocates take a deep breath? (John Colyandro)

Prop. 11 Provides Greater Private Property Protection (Peggy Venable, AFP)

2010 Governor's Race (Peter Morrison Report)

Why Texans Should Vote YES on Constitutional Amendment #7

Focus Health Care Reform on Patients, Not Government (The Hon. Arlene Wohlgemuth, TPPF)

Thought While Shaving: It Just May be Huckabee’s Time (Tom Roeser, DallasBlog)

An Argument In Favor of Prop. 11 (Michele Samuelson)

A Republic, If We Can Keep It (Michele Samuelson)



Daily Blog Links

Lutz blasted judicial activism on WFAA (Dallas Blog)

HPD rolls out innovative new revenue stream (sans acronym, sadly) (blogHouston)

Travis County Taxpayers To Foot Tab For Abortions? (Travis Monitor)

Presumed AG candidate announces re-election campaign for House (Blue Dot Blues)

SHOCKER: White House Inflates 'Success' of Stimulus (Lone Star Times)

Conservative Women; Making a Difference. (RightWingSparkle)

City of Alma: No Property Taxes (Ellis County Observer)

Dangerous time/place/behavior update: A deadly weekend (blogHouston)

DMN - Plano's economic development board seeks restraining order against activist (Collin County Observer)

Sen. John Cornyn Blasts Obama for Trying to Cap Executive Pay (UrbanGrounds)

Why the silence on Prop. 1? Vote No (Empower Texans)

Houston mayoral candidate loans money to campaign, charges usurious interest rate (blogHouston)

At Least One Nobel Prize Make Sense (Excellent Thought)

Propositions 2, 3, and 5 don't create statewide property tax (Lone Star Report Blog)

Democrat Study Finds Republicans Are Raging, But Not Racist (The Republic of Dave)

The Inner City Poor, Politicians Do The Wrong Thing or Nothing (RightWingSparkle)

Where Was Obama? (Rhymes with Right)

Pimp Your Golf Ride on the Guvmint Teat (Lone Star Times)

Is Begging a Free Speech Issue? (Quid Nimis)

Ralph Reed Speaks at Western CPAC (Dr. Melisaa Clouthier)



by State Senator Jane Nelson (R - Lewisville)
An Exclusive Op-Ed to Texas Republic News

The "stimulus" express has left our nation's capitol and arrived at the Texas Capitol, bringing $16.9 billion in federal aid and a looming debate on whether to accept all, some or none of the federal package.

Do we help the federal government go deeper into debt?  Do we watch tax dollars generated in Texas go to other states that have run up enormous budget deficits?  If we accept all or part of the package, what future financial commitments are required by Texas taxpayers?

These and other questions need to be examined before we proceed.  After all, these dollars are not falling out of the sky.  They will come out of our paychecks and those of our grandchildren and great-grandchildren.

During our preliminary deliberations, we are moving forward in the Senate with a budget that does not assume any acceptance of stimulus dollars.  However, discussions are under way to consider those funds.

As Chairman of the Senate Committee on Health & Human Services, I am closely reviewing the federal strings attached to stimulus funding envisioned for social services.  We do not have all of the facts.  However, it is becoming increasingly clear that acceptance of certain portions of the stimulus will obligate Texas taxpayers long after the 2011 federal funding commitment.

The unemployment benefits represent a significant, open-ended entitlement expansion and create an additional financial burden for our state's employers.  Provisions relating to Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) dismantle welfare reforms of the 1990s, which brought about much-needed personal responsibility in the program.  The projected caseload growth with any new federal entitlements will undoubtedly require additional staff and infrastructure.

Some are calling for full and immediate acceptance of these dollars as "temporary assistance." But it would be irresponsible to make this decision hastily.  Taxpayers will have to live with this decision for years to come.  Make no mistake about it -- there is no such thing as a temporary entitlement.

Fortunately, we are in a state that has been living within its means.  Texas remains one of five states with positive cash flow.  Our base budget in the Texas Senate includes a $3.1 billion, in part to cover Medicaid shortfalls in the current budget, totaling $57.6 billion.  That's more than the entire budget of New Zealand, yet there will be loud voices saying it is not enough.

We will meet our responsibility this session to those who depend on state government for their health and well-being -- with or without the stimulus.  We will work to help those Texans who are struggling in this economy.  And yes, we are likely to accept at least a portion of the federal aid.

However, the "stimulus express" needs to slow down so we can figure out exactly where it is taking us.

SENATOR JANE NELSON represents District 12, including portions of Tarrant and Denton Counties.  She is Chairman of the Senate Committee on Health & Human Services.







Social Media



Videos

Pork barrel spending on...PORK!
Commissioner Michael Williams



Empower Texans
Taxpayer Champions & Advocates!



TRN Exclusive Interview
with Land Commissioner Jerry Patterson (1 of 2)



TRN Exclusive Interview
with Comm. Michael Williams (1 of 2)



TRN Exclusive Interview
with St. Sen. Dan Patrick (1 of 3)



TRN Exclusive Interview
with Congressman Ron Paul (1 of 3)